Guardians of the Galaxy: a review


My family saw Guardians of the Galaxy in 2D with friends in a packed theatre on opening weekend. The trailers looked like fun; the reviews were favourable and we were on vacation. What a great choice! This film kept a group of pre-teens (2 girls and 1 boy) and their parents laughing for 2 hours. It was super fun!


The plot is really secondary to the characters and the jokes. Chris Pratt stars as Peter Quill aka as Starlord, an intergalactic smart-ass thief who teams up with a rag-tag group of outlaws. Rocket is a wily genetically engineered racoon bounty hunter (voiced by Bradley Cooper). His tree-like laconic partner Groot (his only words ever being “I am Groot” and voiced by Vin Diesel) is a CGI marvel of strength and size with a remarkable ability to regenerate. Gamora (Zoe Saldana, almost unrecognizable under green body paint and prosthetics) is an out of this world warrior princess and Drax (Dave Bautista) is a vengeful brute who is somewhat on the autism spectrum. Together they are trying to prevent the MacGuffin, which in this case is an orb containing an all powerful infinity stone, from being seized by the bad guy, Ronan (Lee Pace, heavily made-up as an alien). The infinity stone would satisfy Ronan’s need for vengeance, giving him the power to exact swift annihilation of his sworn enemy, the entire planet Xandar.   The plot can be rather confusing at times; luckily, it doesn’t really matter. This film is based on an esoteric comic book; so it isn’t expected to bear scrutiny.

The characters are well drawn and distinct. Their partnership is plausible and rather touching at times. The acting is superb. The comedy is not only dialogue driven; it is also physical and integrated with a classic rock sound track that defines Starlord. The actor-led action sequences are pretty fun, although some of the spaceship  battles, with their scenes of destruction, go on a bit long. Regardless, there was enough goodwill earned to ignore those shortcomings.

Kudos to director and writer James Gunn. He managed to take a group of fringe characters from an obscure comic book and craft one of the most entertaining and refreshing super-hero movies that I have seen in a long time. This is a zany film that filled a theatre with raucous laughter. The communal experience added to my enjoyment, even though it contributed to me missing a few lines to the sound of laughter . That is ok, I would be happy to watch it again at home in a few months.

The Hobbit 2: a Review


It is that time of year again. Yes, of course I mean the time to revisit Middle Earth in the 2nd of 3 instalments of the Hobbit movies. I went to the theatre to see it in 3D (would have preferred 2D but the show times were not in our favour) with my husband (big fan of Tolkien’s Middle Earth), my eldest daughter and her friend. My youngest made it clear that she was not interested, after having watched the first instalment. She was happy to visit with friends instead.

I had mixed feelings going in. I have no particular affection or nostalgia for Middle Earth. I felt the first movie was bloated so I was prepared for the worst. However, I am fond of some of the actors (Ian McKellan, Richard Armitage, Martin Freeman, Aidan Turner, Dean O’Gorman, Lee Pace and Benedict Cumberbatch) and I think Peter Jackson is a visual genius. BUT this is essentially a road movie with very little character development. Yet it has a large, mostly neglected, ensemble cast. The perils encountered along the journey held my interest to varying degrees but few were memorable beyond the moment – except perhaps the barrel escape. When the company gets separated, the movie switches clumsily between Gandalf’s solo (?pointless) side quest and the company of 13 Dwarves + 1 Hobbit.

I enjoy road movies if there is character development as well as colourful or funny encounters. Sigh, this film had none of this. It felt like endless action sequences stitched to boring expository scenes. Oh yes, I almost forgot, there is a terribly shoehorned love triangle (Legolas, Tauriel, Fili). That was not enough to have me invested in the fate of any of the characters. To make matters worse, the movie ends on a complete cliff hanger. “Quelle surprise” its the middle of a trilogy.

You would think that after watching this group on their quest for 5+ hours and over 2 films, I should care about their fates. I — so —- really —- don’t. Regardless, I will be back for the last instalment in approximately 1 years time. Why not skip it? It is visually stunning and because my daughter and husband really liked this movie. So I don’t mind spending a bit more time with them in the company of Ian McKellan, Richard Armitage, Martin Freeman, Aidan Turner, Dean O’Gorman, Lee Pace and Benedict Cumberbatch.  Hopefully in 2D, as 3D was completely unnecessary. This remains a movie for fans of Tolkien who want to spend as much time in Middle Earth as possible. Alas, that is not me.

The Hobbit and a Return to Middle Earth


My husband has been itching to see this movie for weeks now and in anticipation, the whole family got ready for the event by re-watching all 3 extended installments of the Lord of the Rings. They hold up well and it was an enjoyable jaunt.  My husband is a huge fan of the books, ever since childhood. Me, not so much, I read them all as a young adult. The Hobbit, was an enjoyable read but it did not resonate in any special way. The Lord of the Rings trilogy, UGH, was a slog of a read. I finished it but felt that I was reading another language. I hate reading long descriptive dialogue free verse. Clearly these books were not made for me and left me feeling stupid and inadequate. That was over 20 years ago, and revisiting the books is on my bucket list. Perhaps I was just too immature at the time I read them. As for the movie adaptations, they were enjoyable enough but rather long and dragged at times. A considerable amount of eye candy (Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn) definitely helped buoy me through a 9 hour road movie.

When I heard that Peter Jackson was turning The Hobbit into 3 films, I immediately thought, “what a money grab.” Certainly, economies of scale from microeconomics 101 taught me this. But clearly the die-hard Tolkien fans don’t mind spending as much time in Middle Earth as possible. Unfortunately, I am simply a casual fan, as is my youngest daughter. I struggled through the 1st part of the film (we saw it in 2D , all 2h40mins of it) placating my youngest daughter as she grumbled “Mommy, this movie is boring, I want to leave.” She settled when she realized that hers was a very privileged problem and that I was not going to bail and the story started to pick up (when the group ran into the trolls).

This film is a prequel to the LOTR and deals with Bilbo Baggins’ (Martin Freeman) adventures with Gandalf (Ian McLellan) as they assist a group of displaced dwarves in a quest to recapture their homeland from the conquering dragon Smaug. It too is a road movie with many adventures and battles along the way; all of which are done with imaginative skill and a dose of humour. My biggest complaint is how it takes its sweet time hitting the road. The first half of the movie really drags. This could have been a single film. It was overindulged and poorly paced. I will not start picking at plot holes (of which there are many – “wait eagle, thanks for rescuing us from a certain death but why did you drop us off on this mountain when we clearly want to go to that mountain, way off in the distance, come back, come back”). It is beautifully filmed and well acted. Also in the plus column, this film has many performers that I have fondness for (Richard Armitage as Thorin, the dwarf king; Aidan Turner as the hottest dwarf, Kili; Lee Pace as Thranduil, Elvenking, Martin Freeman), not the least is creepy old Gollum. The end of the film, of course is abrupt, as there are 2 more films to follow in completion of the tale. At least we got to see Bilbo’s acquisition of the “precious” ring.

So overall I enjoyed myself, as did my husband and eldest daughter. Stretching this 279 page children’s novel to trilogy of films still feels like money grab to me, a casual fan. But perhaps, I am biased because  as a rule, I don’t care for multi-part movies that make me wait a year between installments (Kill Bill, Pirates of the Caribbean II & III). I would just as soon wait for a marathon viewing at home on DVD. But this film was not made for me; it was made for the die-hard fan of Middle Earth, of which my husband would qualify. The slow start to this film failed to win me over to that camp. My youngest daughter was begging not to be dragged to the next installment. I hope her mind will change because I know my husband and eldest daughter will want to go. I do not want to be left out of a shared experience, which always makes a film more enjoyable to me. Oh well, maybe I will pull the book off my daughter’s bookcase and return to Middle Earth, if only to refresh my memory on the ending.

Blog Stats

  • 14,220 hits